By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
Once
again, the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir is convulsed in lethal violence
pitting stone-throwing youths against armed police officers and security
forces. The unrest is a major
setback for peace in the long-troubled region claimed by both
India and Pakistan, where an insurgency movement peaked in the 1990s, then
waned, but never completely disappeared.
The
trigger was the killing on July 8 by Indian security forces of Burhan Muzaffar
Wani, a charismatic, 22-year-old separatist who wanted an independent Kashmir
and had built up a following on social media among disaffected Indian Kashmiri
youth. Since Mr. Wani’s death, some 40 people have been killed, including one
police officer, during confrontations between protesters and security forces.
Thousands have been injured, many by pellet guns wielded by the police and
security forces as a crude form of crowd control. Kashmir’s hospitals are
overwhelmed, and more than 100 people, mostly young, are threatened with blindness by pellets
lodged in their eyes.
Meanwhile,
many Kashmiris are living in a state of siege, under a strict curfew with
access to basic communication — including cellular, landline and internet
services — cut off by authorities. On Saturday, police raidednewspaper offices in Kashmir, and
state authorities banned publication for three days, a measure that is
profoundly troubling in democratic India.
A major
cause of the uprising is the resentment among Kashmiri youths who have come of
age under an Indian security apparatus that acts against civilians with
impunity. Kashmir is subject to India’s Armed Forces Special Powers Act, or
Afspa, which grants the military wide powers to arrest, shoot to kill, occupy
or destroy property. The result is a culture of brutal disdain for the local
population.
Troubling
questions about the timing and the circumstances of Mr. Wani’s death remain
unanswered. So too are questions about the apparently indiscriminate use of
pellet guns. These and other questions argue for an independent investigation
into the use of force by security forces, and for the reform of practices —
including censorship, communications blackouts, and those allowed by Afspa –
that are unworthy of India’s democracy.
A
failure to take these steps will only push more young Kashmiris into militancy,
and make impossible a political solution that alone can bring an end to the
desperation that has, once again, gripped the region.
No comments:
Post a Comment